midpage

Pardell v. Humana Medical Plan, Inc.Pardell v. Humana Medical Plan, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida
May 21, 1991
No. 90-2829
Versions:
PER CURIAM.

Assuming that the point is not foreclosed by the law of the case doctrine, we conclude that a health maintenance organization which conducts peer review of physicians under section 766.101, Florida Statutes (1989), is a “person” entitled to attorney’s fees and costs as a prevailing defendant under paragraph 766.101(6)(a). See § 1.01(3), Fla.Stat. (1989).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Pardell v. Humana Medical Plan, Inc.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 21, 1991
Citations: 580 So. 2d 286; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5243; 1991 WL 82537; No. 90-2829
Docket Number: No. 90-2829
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In