Parameswar v. ParameswarParameswar v. Parameswar
In a family offense proceeding pursuant to
Ordered that the order of protection is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Although the order of protection expired by its own terms on June 7, 2013, in light of the enduring consequences which may potentially flow from a finding that the appellant committed a family offense, the appeal has not been rendered academic (see e.g. Matter of Hefley v Favors, 106 AD3d 909 [2013]; Matter of Wallace v Wallace, 45 AD3d 599 [2007]; Matter of DeSouza-Brown v Brown, 38 AD3d 888 [2007]).
A family offense must be established by a fair preponderance of the evidence (see
Here, a fair preponderance of the credible evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing supports the Family Court‘s determination that the appellant committed the family offenses of harassment in the second degree and disorderly conduct (see