Panzarella v. Multiple Parking Services, Inc.Panzarella v. Multiple Parking Services, Inc.
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that it had no actual or constructive notice of a dangerous icy condition on the parking lot where plaintiff fell and that it was not afforded a reasonable time after a temperature fluctuation that created the icy condition to exercise due care to correct the situation. The evidence establishes that the ice on the parking lot was
Supreme Court properly refused to charge the jury on implied assumption of the risk. The evidence at trial establishes that, at the time of her fall, plaintiff was not aware of the ice (see, Pisciotta v Parisi,
Finally, the jury award of $160,000 for future pain and suffering does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see,