History
  • No items yet
midpage
Panico v. Young
46 N.Y.2d 847
NY
1979
Check Treatment

Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [Cardozo, Ch. J.]; Matter of Brooklyn Hosp. v Lennon, 45 NY2d 820).

Case Details

Case Name: Panico v. Young
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 9, 1979
Citation: 46 N.Y.2d 847
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.