History
  • No items yet
midpage
Palmer v. Selpan Electric Co.
2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2813
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2004
|
Check Treatment

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Salerno, J.), entered June 2, 2003, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the action for failure to appoint and substitute a representative for the estate of the deceased plaintiff, without prejudice to renewal “upon a showing of undue delay in the appointment of an administrator,” unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion granted.

It has been six years since the accident, five years since the commencement of the action, and four years since the death of the plaintiff. No representative has been substituted, despite numerous attempts over the last three years, by plaintiffs attorney, to have plaintiffs father appoint a representative. Accordingly, since substitution has not been made “within a reasonable time,” defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 1021 should have been granted. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan and Friedman, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Palmer v. Selpan Electric Co.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 18, 2004
Citation: 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2813
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.