History
  • No items yet
midpage
Palmer v. Hatch
9 Johns. 329
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1812
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

After the deputy had arrested Usher, he voluntarily left him in custody of two of his brothers, in order to go and execute other process. This was leaving the prisoner at large, and was clearly an escape; for the two brothers of the prisoner had no authority, after the deputy had left them, to detain the prisoner. The case of Benton v. Sutton (1 Bos. & Pull. 24.) is directly to this point, and the argument appears to be conclusive.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Case Details

Case Name: Palmer v. Hatch
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1812
Citation: 9 Johns. 329
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.