History
  • No items yet
midpage
Palmer v. Duncanson
254 Mass. 494
Mass.
1926
Check Treatment
By the Couet.

The question reported is whether a proper basis had been laid for the admission of secondary evidence as to the contents of books of account. The preliminary finding of the judge to the effect that there was such basis was amply justified by testimony which need not be narrated. Smith v. Brown, 151 Mass. 338. Whitney v. Lynch, 222 Mass. 112, 116. The case is distinguishable from Post v. Leland, 184 Mass. 601.

Judgments to be entered on the verdicts.

Case Details

Case Name: Palmer v. Duncanson
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Jan 26, 1926
Citation: 254 Mass. 494
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.