11 Misc. 459 | City of New York Municipal Court | 1895
It appears from the complaint in each of these actions that plaintiff sues to recover compensation for making for the city the necessary maps required in the proceedings to open a street under the charter (Laws of 1888, chap. 583, tit. 19); that the defendant employed the plaintiff to make the maps, at the proper stage of the proceedings, which maps he duly made and delivered to defendant, and that the amount claimed for such services is fixed by the ordinances of the city; that defendant thereafter, and before the assessments were imposed, rescinded the resolution directing and authorizing the proceedings, and thereby abandoned and discontinued them while in their incomplete condition.
The contention of appellant is that the city is specially exempted from all liability for any expense incurred in open
This view seems to us to be fully sustained by the authorities. Payne v. Brooklyn, 52 Hun, 390; Weston v. Syracuse, 31 N. Y. Supp. 186 ; Reilly v. Albany, 112 N. Y. 30-42; Sage v. Brooklyn, 89 id. 189; McCormack v. Brooklyn, 108 id. 49 ; Donnelly v. Brooklyn, 121 id. 9.
Judgments affirmed, with costs.
Osborne, J., concurs.
Judgments affirmed, with costs.