Brenda ABERCROMBIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-5802
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 20, 2007
406
Before: COOK and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges; and EDGAR, District Judge.*
*The Honorable Robert Allan Edgar, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.
Brenda Abercrombie appeals the district court‘s dismissal of her suit against the United States Department of Agriculture for lack subject matter of jurisdiction. Having reviewed the record and the applicable law, and having the benefit of oral argument and the parties’ briefs, we determine that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirm the district court‘s decision for the reasons stated in that court‘s opinion.
Eugene PALLISCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HURON TOWNSHIP; Huron Township Local Development Finance Authority; Leslie Meyers; David Nielsen, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 06-1638
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 20, 2007
406
Before: COLE, SUTTON, and COOK, Circuit Judges.
Eugene Pallisco appeals the district court‘s dismissal of his suit against the defendants1 for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Having reviewed the record and the applicable law, and having the benefit of oral argument and the parties’ briefs, we determine that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirm the district court‘s decision for the reasons stated in that court‘s opinion.
Nancy FIGUEROA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 06-3770
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 21, 2007
407
Before: COOK and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges; and EDGAR, District Judge.*
*The Honorable Robert Allan Edgar, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.
Nancy Figueroa appeals the district court‘s judgment against her on her claims of discrimination, retaliation, and violations of the Family Medical Leave Act, the Federal Employee Compensation Act, and the Federal Tort Claims Act. Having reviewed the record, the applicable law, and the parties’ briefs, we determine that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirm the district court‘s decision for the reasons stated in that court‘s opinion.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph E. KENNEDY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-3029
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 21, 2007
407