midpage

Palladino v. TurnerPalladino v. Turner

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 7, 1972
No. 42120
Versions:263 So. 2d 206
1972 Fla. LEXIS 3594
PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus, the brief of petitioner, and the return of the respondent, we conclude that the alternative writ should be discharged without prejudice. Petitioner *207may reapply for bail pending appeal in accord with the standards enunciated in Younghans v. State, 90 So.2d 308 (Fla.1956) and F.A.R. 6.15(b), 32 F.S.A.; however, on reapplication petitioner remains subject to existing statutory limitations on bail, including Fla.Stat. § 903.132, F.S.A., as may be applicable.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Palladino v. Turner
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jun 7, 1972
Citations: 263 So. 2d 206; 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3594; No. 42120
Docket Number: No. 42120
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
Log In