History
  • No items yet
midpage
Paliotto v. Hartman
9 Misc. 2d 963
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1957
Check Treatment
George P. Stier, J.

Motion to dismiss the second cause of action against Sylvester Cosentino upon the ground that said action was barred by the Statute of Limitations. Inasmuch as the moving defendant under the second cause of action is an alleged conspirator with the other defendants to accomplish the wrong charged in the first cause of action (Green v. Davies, 83 App. Div. 216) he is united in interest with his coconspirators *964within the meaning of section 16 of the Civil Pi-actice Act. His motion to dismiss the second cause of action as not having been commenced against him within the time limited by law is denied.

Submit order on notice.

Case Details

Case Name: Paliotto v. Hartman
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 27, 1957
Citation: 9 Misc. 2d 963
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.