History
  • No items yet
midpage
Palethorp v. Palethorp
198 Pa. 395
Pa.
1901
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

A careful consideration of the defendant’s exhaustive argument against the plaintiff’s contention has not convinced us of error in the master’s report or in the decree entered by the court below. It follows as a natural and reasonable sequence that the decree should be affirmed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.

Case Details

Case Name: Palethorp v. Palethorp
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Feb 18, 1901
Citation: 198 Pa. 395
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 249
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.