Palansky v. Reich

168 A. 297 | N.J. | 1933

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court, and printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 106.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.