io, 301 U.S. 667 (SCOTUS 1937)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Supreme Court of the United States","description":"Read the full text of Painter v. Ohio (Painter v. Ohio, 301 U.S. 667 (SCOTUS 1937)). This 1937-05-24 00:00:00 legal opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage's AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/painter-v-ohio-8152451"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/painter-v-ohio-8152451","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Painter v. Ohio, Supreme Court of the United States, Painter v. Ohio, 301 U.S. 667 (SCOTUS 1937)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}37:T438, Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee for leave to file a statement against jurisdiction is granted. The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 315; Westfall v. United States, 274 U.