Padro v. State
428 So. 2d 290
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1983
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Finding that defendant Padro’s extrajudicial statement denying criminal responsibility constituted an admission from which *291guilt might be inferred rather than a confession, that his statement was therefore admissible prior to the establishment of the corpus delicti, Nelson v. State, 372 So.2d 949 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), and that his remaining points lack merit, we affirm the conviction.