Padilla Estala v. Mullin, 1:26-cv-00800

ORDER

Before the Court is Petitioner‘s “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241” (Dkt. No. 1) (“Petition“), the “Magistrate Judge‘s Report and Recommendation” (Dkt. No. 4) (“R&R“), and “Petitioner‘s Objections to the Magistrate Judge‘s Report and Recommendation” (Dkt. No. 5) (“Objections“).

The R&R recommends that the Court: (1) deny the Petition and (2) direct the Clerk of Court to close the case. Dkt. No. 4 at 1.

When a party objects to a magistrate judge‘s report and recommendation, the Court reviews the matter de novo. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). After such review, the Court hereby OVERRULES Petitioner‘s Objections (Dkt. No. 5) and ADOPTS the R&R (Dkt. No. 4).

Accordingly, the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is hereby DENIED and the Clerk of Court is INSTRUCTED to close this case.

SIGNED this September 1, 2026

Rolando Olvera

United States District Judge

Case Details

Case Name: Padilla Estala v. Mullin

Court Name: District Court, S.D. Texas

Date Published: Sep 1, 2026

Citation: 1:26-cv-00800

Docket Number: 1:26-cv-00800

Court Abbreviation: S.D. Tex.