70 P. 86 | Cal. | 1902
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in a suit to enforce a street-assessment lien. The case as shown by the findings is as follows: —
The resolution of intention initiating the assesment proceedings in question was duly passed by the Board of Supervisors of San Francisco, April 8, 1895, — the work proposed being the improvement of Webster Street, between Oak and Page streets, in that city, a distance of one block only, the street to the north and south being already improved. Within due time a written objection to the proposed work was made by the owners of a majority of the frontage on the proposed work, and was allowed by the board; and this, it is in effect alleged and found, operated as a bar for six months, to any further proceeding. After the expiration of the six months, the board, without other resolution of intention, ordered the work to be done.
On these facts, it is claimed on behalf of the respondent, that upon the filing of the protest of the property-owners, the board was divested of jurisdiction to proceed further without a new resolution of intention; and this contention is fully sustained by the decisions of this court. (City Street Improvement Co. v.Babcock,
We therefore advise, on the authority of that case, that the judgment appealed from be affirmed.
Haynes, C., and Cooper, C., concurred.
For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Harrison, J., Garoutte, J., Van Dyke, J.