History
  • No items yet
midpage
Oxford Knitting Mills v. Sutton
127 Ga. 162
Ga.
1906
Check Treatment
Atkinson, J.

Under the provisions of the Civil Code, § 5681, a prochein ami, who has prosecuted a personal action in the name and behalf of a minor, will not be allowed to receive the proceeds of the suit until he has executed the bond therein provided for. This, however, does not prevent a lawfully authorized levying officer from proceeding with the collection'of the execution issued upon such judgment. Payment to the lawfully authorized officer will he protection for the defendant, and it is the officer who will be interested in seeing that the prochein ami gives the bond. The bond is never required until the time comes for the prochein ami “to receive the proceeds,” and that condition does not exist while the enforcement of the execution continues to remain in the coercive state. It follows that it is not an available ground of illegality to the enforcement of snch execution that the prochein ami has not given the bond before mentioned.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Oxford Knitting Mills v. Sutton
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 15, 1906
Citation: 127 Ga. 162
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.