History
  • No items yet
midpage
Owens v. State
33 Ga. App. 32
Ga. Ct. App.
1924
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the verdict finding the defendant guilty of seduction.

The charge of the court Avas full and fair. The two excerpts from the charge of the court complained of in the special grounds of the motion are not erroneous.

Eor no reason pointed out in the record or presented by the argument did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. H. A. Hodges, J. H. Dorsey, for plaintiff in error. J. B. Wall, solicitor-general, Hal Lawson, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Owens v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 12, 1924
Citation: 33 Ga. App. 32
Docket Number: 15742
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.