History
  • No items yet
midpage
Owens v. State
16 Ala. App. 413
Ala. Ct. App.
1918
Check Treatment

Before a defendant can be convicted of uttering a forged instrument, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was a forged instrument, and that the defendant, knowing the instrument to be forged, with the intent to defraud, uttered it. The check in evidence purported to have been signed by Raymond Bradford, and was made payable to the order of Tom Jones, for $5.06. Bradford testified:

"I had these checks made myself; that is, just exactly like the check I used. * * * I never issued a check of that character to this man. * * * I did not issue the check."

This was all the evidence tending to prove the forgery. All of this may have been true, and yet no forgery have occurred. There is nothing in the evidence to show that Bradford did not authorize the signing of the check. *Page 414

From the facts as disclosed by the bill of exceptions, the court erred in refusing to give the general charge as requested by the defendant.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Owens v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 2, 1918
Citation: 16 Ala. App. 413
Docket Number: 8 Div. 537.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.