Overlie v. StateOverlie v. State
- Reporters:
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Duane Landrus Jr. appealed from a district court order denying his motion for reconsideration, which is treated on this appeal as a motion for relief from a final judgment under
[¶2] We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Landrus‘s motion. The district court properly applied the child support guidelines in determining the child support Landrus owes to two obligees. Wages were properly imputed to Landrus as an incarcerated individual. See A.M.S. ex rel. Farthing v. Stoppleworth, 2005 ND 64, 694 N.W.2d 8 (holding incarceration does not excuse support obligation and wages may be imputed to an incarcerated individual). We summarily affirm under
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner