History
  • No items yet
midpage
Otto v. Otto
265 A.D. 1037
N.Y. App. Div.
1943
Check Treatment

All concur, except Harris, J., not voting. (The order directs defendant to pay ten dollars per week until plaintiff’s judgment against defendant is fully satisfied; the second order *1038denies defendant’s motion to modify the previous order.) Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Otto v. Otto
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 27, 1943
Citation: 265 A.D. 1037
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.