midpage

Ott v. SweatmanOtt v. Sweatman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 21, 1895
Appeal, No. 6
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Dean
Per Curiam,

The learned trial judge rightly held that ‍‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‍the agreements, between Leiling and Ott constituted a conditional sale and pot a bailment; and hence ‍‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‍there was no error in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant in the issue. ‍‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‍All that can be profitably said on the controlling question in the case will be ‍‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‍found in the able and exhaustive opinion of the court below’ on the rule for a ‍‌​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‍new trial. On it we affirm the judgment.

Case Details

Case Name: Ott v. Sweatman
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 21, 1895
Citations: 31 A. 102; 166 Pa. 217; 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1181; Appeal, No. 6
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 6
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
Log In