History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ott v. Sweatman
166 Pa. 217
Pa.
1895
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The learned trial judge rightly held that the agreements, between Leiling and Ott constituted a conditional sale and pot a bailment; and hence there was no error in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant in the issue. All that can be profitably said on the controlling question in the case will be found in the able and exhaustive opinion of the court below' on the rule for a new trial. On it we affirm the judgment.

Case Details

Case Name: Ott v. Sweatman
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 21, 1895
Citation: 166 Pa. 217
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 6
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
    Ott v. Sweatman, 166 Pa. 217