History
  • No items yet
midpage
Otenio Longorio v. State
48 S.W. 514
Tex. Crim. App.
1898
Check Treatment

This is a motion for a writ of certiorari. At the Dallas term, 1898, the appeal herein was dismissed because of the want of a final judgment. 44 S.W. Rep., 1089. On April 6, 1898, and subsequent to the adjournment of said Dallas term, mandate was issued. On May 2d application for certiorari was filed at Austin. A motion for rehearing has not been filed, nor a request to recall mandate, and the case stands in the attitude of asking a certiorari to perfect a record that has no standing in this court. The proceeding had been dismissed and the mandate issued in accordance with the judgment of dismissal. If appellants desired a reconsideration of their case, the proper steps, in proper time, should have been taken to have the same reviewed. The office of a certiorari is to perfect a record. It does not serve the purpose of a motion for rehearing and recall of mandate in order to reinstate the case. As presented the motion for certiorari can not be entertained. It is therefore dismissed.

Dismissed. *Page 105

Case Details

Case Name: Otenio Longorio v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Dec 21, 1898
Citation: 48 S.W. 514
Docket Number: Motion No. 307.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.