History
  • No items yet
midpage
Oswald v. State of New York
1793 U.S. LEXIS 247
| SCOTUS | 1793
|
Check Treatment
2 U.S. 415 (____)
2 Dall. 415

OSWALD, Administrator,
versus
the STATE of NEW-YORK.

Supreme Court of United States.

PROCLAMATION was made in this cause, "that any person having authority to appear for the State of New-York is required to appear accordingly;" and no person appearing it was ordered, on motion of Coxe for the Plaintiff,

BY THE COURT: — Unless the State appears by the first day of next Term to the above suit, or shew cause to the contrary, judgment will be entered by default against the said state.[*]

NOTES

[*] See ant. p. 401 and also post. Chisholm, executor, versus Georgia. Cutting, administrator, versus South Carolina. Grayson versus Virginia

Case Details

Case Name: Oswald v. State of New York
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Feb 20, 1793
Citation: 1793 U.S. LEXIS 247
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.