History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ostrom v. Sapolsky
49 Misc. 610
N.Y. App. Term.
1905
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The motion made by the plaintiff herein was, clearly, a motion to amend or modify the judgment and, as such, came within the provisions of section 254 of the Municipal Court Act; and, not having been made within five days, as therein prescribed, the court below had no jurisdiction to entertain it and could not grant the relief asked for. Buschbaum v. Feldman, 43 Misc. 85. The appeal herein, however, being from the judgment as well as the order, this court may, upon appeal, “ reverse, affirm or modify the judgment or final order appealed from” (§ 310, Mun. Ct. Act), and the judgment herein may be modified by inserting therein *611the words: “ Defendant liable to arrest and imprisonment on execution.”

Order affirmed and judgment modified, without costs to either party.

Present: Scott, Bischoff and McLean, JJ.

Order affirmed and judgment modified, without costs to either party.

Case Details

Case Name: Ostrom v. Sapolsky
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1905
Citation: 49 Misc. 610
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.