History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ostrofsky v. United Steelworkers
273 F.2d 614
4th Cir.
1960
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

For the reason that the plaintiffs utterly failed to cooperate with the union, as clearly shown in the opinion of the District Court, 171 F.Supp. 782, we think the union was neither unreasonable nor arbitrary in refusing to prosecute the *615grievances of the plaintiffs. Consequently, no right of action has accrued to them against the union or against their former employer.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Ostrofsky v. United Steelworkers
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 7, 1960
Citation: 273 F.2d 614
Docket Number: No. 7905
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In