History
  • No items yet
midpage
Osgood v. Stevenson
143 Mass. 399
| Mass. | 1887
|
Check Treatment
Field, J.

If the contract, after the defendant signed and delivered it, was materially altered without his authority, the contract thus altered was not made by the defendant. The insertion of the word “cloth” and of the figures “$6.25” was plainly a material alteration. The plaintiffs declare upon a contract which the jury have found to have been materially altered without the defendant’s consent, and it is therefore not the defendant’s contract.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Osgood v. Stevenson
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Jan 10, 1887
Citation: 143 Mass. 399
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.