midpage

Oscar Hearde and Esther Hearde v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueOscar Hearde and Esther Hearde v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Mar 11, 1970
23380
Versions:
PER CURIAM.

Appellant taxpayers decline to itemize or identify recipients of alleged estimated charitable donations made by them in the years 1962 through 1964 inclusive. Their estimate was that they donated 20% of their gross income. Appellants urge any disclosures of the beneficiaries would interfere with their First and Fifth Amendment rights.

The Commissioner rejected the taxpayers’ estimates, but allowed them the 10% deduction from .their adjusted gross income. (Sec. 170(a) (1), Int.Rev.Code and Treas.Regs. § 1.170-l(a) (2))

The disclosure required is an indirect burden on the exercise of religion, and does not make unlawful the practice of the religion itself. Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 607, 81 S.Ct. 1144, 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961). Hence the requirement of disclosure is constitutional, and the regulations are reasonable. Lingenfelder v. Commissioner, 38 T.C. 44

We affirm the decision of the Tax Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Oscar Hearde and Esther Hearde v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 11, 1970
Citations: 421 F.2d 846; 23380
Docket Number: 23380
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
Log In