History
  • No items yet
midpage
Osburne v. Gilbert
52 Barb. 158
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1868
Check Treatment
By the Court, Marvin, J.

Clapp v. Graves, (26 N. Y. Rep. 418,) is decisive of this case. The only difference in the two cases is that in that case the issue was joined, nothing being said as to the residence of the defendant; in this case the attorney for the defendant said that the defendant resided in Allegany county; but he did not plead that fact, nor would he make an affidavit of it; and the justice very properly said that there was no evidence of the fact before him; that he would decide when there was. The defendant, by answering the complaint, waived any defense on the ground of residence, and thus gave the justice jurisdiction of his person, and the cause of action was one proper for a justice’s court. The question raised is fully discussed and decided in Clapp v. Graves, and there is no occasion for any further discussion.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Daniels, Marvin and Barleer, Justices.]

Case Details

Case Name: Osburne v. Gilbert
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 16, 1868
Citation: 52 Barb. 158
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.