History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ortman v. Dixon
9 Cal. 23
Cal.
1858
Check Treatment
Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., concurring.

Application for mandamus to the Judge of the Tuba District Court.

This was a chancery suit, in which a decree was rendered for plaintiffs, perpetually enjoining the defendants from diverting the waters of Mill Creek. Pending a motion for a new trial, the defendants violated the injunction, and plaintiffs applied for an attachment against them for contempt of Court, which was refused upon the ground that the pending of the motion operated as a suspension of the injunction.

We think that this was error. Let a peremptory mandamus issue.

Case Details

Case Name: Ortman v. Dixon
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1858
Citation: 9 Cal. 23
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.