History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ortiz v. Knighton
14 A.D.2d 679
N.Y. App. Div.
1961
Check Treatment

Plaintiff’s vehicle was struck in the rear by defendant’s vehicle and no issue is raised on this motion as to the course and speed of the vehicles, or the surrounding circumstances. Nevertheless, an issue of fact exists whether defendant was negligent, that is, whether what defendant eoncededly did was in fact a breach of the duty of due care. (Hajder v. G. & G. *680Moderns, 13 A D 2d 651.) The failure of defendant to submit a personal affidavit giving an exculpating version of the accident does not eliminate the factual question of negligence (see Gerard v. Inglese, 11 A D 2d 381, 383). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Noonan, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Ortiz v. Knighton
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 28, 1961
Citation: 14 A.D.2d 679
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.