midpage

Ortiz v. City of New YorkOrtiz v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals
Mar 25, 2010
116 SSM 5
Versions:14 N.Y.3d 779
925 N.E.2d 582
898 N.Y.S.2d 544

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, defendant City of New York’s motion for summary judgment granted, the complaint and all cross claims against the City of New York dismissed, and certified question answered in the negative. No triable issue of fact exists as to whether the City created a dangerous condition that caused plaintiffs injuries.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Grapfeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Case Details

Case Name: Ortiz v. City of New York
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 25, 2010
Citations: 14 N.Y.3d 779; 925 N.E.2d 582; 898 N.Y.S.2d 544; 116 SSM 5
Docket Number: 116 SSM 5
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In