Appellant Kelvin Orr has filed two appeals in which he takes issue with the trial court’s denial of his motion to void the judgment of conviction entered against him in 1992 when he entered guilty pleas to an indictment charging him with malice murder and an accusation charging him with armed robbery of the murder victim.
1
In conjunction with the entry of his guilty plea to the armed robbery accusation, appellant executed a written waiver of indictment. In his April 2002 motion, appellant contended the convictions are void because he was statutorily prevented from waiving his right to be tried on an indictment when the crime charged was one punishable
*92
by death or life imprisonment. See OCGA § 17-7-70. He also complained his guilty pleas were not voluntary and were the product of trial counsel’s wrongful conduct and ineffective assistance. In denying appellant’s post-conviction motion, the trial court relied on
Garmon v. Johnson,
1. Appellant contends the trial court erred when it denied the motion to void the judgment of conviction entered on his plea of guilty to an accusation charging him with armed robbery because OCGA § 17-7-70 (b) prohibits a waiver of indictment when one is charged with a felony punishable by death or life imprisonment. The statute authorizes superior court judges to open their courts “without the presence of either a grand jury or a trial jury” to receive and act upon guilty pleas in misdemeanor and felony cases, “except those punishable by death or life imprisonment,” when the defendant , and the judge consent.
2
While the acceptance of guilty pleas in felony cases punishable by death or life imprisonment without a grand or petit jury being present might appear to be precluded by § 17-7-70 (b), this Court has determined that the statute does not preclude a trial court’s acceptance of a guilty plea to an accusation charging a felony punishable by life imprisonment when the accused has waived indictment in writing.
Garmon v. Johnson,
supra,
2. Appellant sees error in the trial court’s failure to address appellant’s claims that his 1992 guilty pleas were not voluntary and were the result of ineffective assistance of counsel. Looking at the substance of this portion of appellant’s motion rather than its nomenclature, it is clear that appellant is seeking to withdraw his guilty pleas. See
Thompson v. State,
3. Nor did the trial court err when it failed to appoint counsel to aid appellant with the motion to void the judgment of conviction. An indigent defendant is entitled to representation by counsel only for trial and for the direct appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence.
Gibson v. Turpin,
4. Appellant contends he is entitled to a direct appeal from the entry of a guilty plea. While a defendant who pleads guilty is entitled to a direct appeal when “the question on appeal is one which may be resolved by facts appearing in the record,”
(Smith v. State,
Judgments affirmed.
Notes
Case No. S02A1543 stems from the 1991 murder indictment; Case No. S02A1544 stems from the 1991 armed robbery accusation.
OCGA § 17-7-70 (b) abrogates the common law under which the trial court was without jurisdiction to try an accused or accept a plea of guilty from one charged with a felony until the grand jury had returned an indictment.
Weatherbed v. State,
