History
  • No items yet
midpage
Orr v. Amory
11 Mass. 25
Mass.
1814
Check Treatment
By the Court.

It has been heretofore settled, that the assignees of bankrupts, duly appointed under the laws of a foreign country, cannot maintain actions, in their own- names, in our courts, for demands due to such bankrupts, (a) A chose in action, such as is the subject of the present action, is not assignable at the common law, nor by any statute provision recognized in this commonwealth, where the remedy is sought to be maintained. The contract of Birnie if Rockendorff with the defendant is not to be [ * 26 ] varied in its import * and effect by a voluntary assign rnent on their part. The action is not maintained.

Plaintiffs nonsuit.

Chitty, Plead. 17, 7th ed. — Sed vide Goodwin vs. Jones, 3 Mass. Rep. 517. — Ingraham, vs. Geyer, 13 Mass. Rep. 146.

Case Details

Case Name: Orr v. Amory
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1814
Citation: 11 Mass. 25
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.