Orpen v. Watson
1915 N.J. LEXIS 333
N.J.
1915
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in Devlin v. Wilson (ante p. 180), delivered at the present term, the judgment under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, SWAY'ZE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MlNTURN, KALISCH, Black, Yredenburgi-i, White, Terhune, Williams, Taylor, J J. 14.

For reversal—None.