Orgel v. Stewart Title Insurance

Jan 31, 2012
Versions:91 A.D.3d 922
938 N.Y.S.2d 131
938 N.Y.2d 131

Under the unique circumstances of this case, and given the unresolved questions as to the validity of the subject mortgage, the defendant Philip Atherley (hereinafter the defendant) was entitled to vacatur of the judgment of foreclosure and sale entered on his default “in the interests of substantial justice” (Goldman v Cotter, 10 AD3d 289, 293 [2004]; see Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 68 [2003]; Ladd v Stevenson, 112 NY 325, 332 [1889]; Katz v Marra, 74 AD3d 888 [2010]). In particular, we note that the documentary evidence raises significant issues as to whether the mortgage was fraudulently procured. However, the defendant failed to establish his entitlement to dismissal of the complaint under any of the CPLR 3211 (a) grounds he asserted (see CPLR 3211 [a] [3], [7], [8]; see generally Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83 [1994]; Tikvah Enters., LLC v Neuman, 80 AD3d 748 [2011]).

The plaintiff‘s remaining contentions are without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination. Florio, J.P., Belen, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.