History
  • No items yet
midpage
Oreña v. Sherman
61 Cal. 101
Cal.
1882
Check Treatment
The Court :

Section 3633 of the Political Code, can not be held to be unconstitutional unless it be inconsistent with some provision of the Constitution, and as we read Section 8 of Article xiii. of the Constitution there is no inconsistency between said section of the Code and the Constitution. As we construe the Constitution, that section of the Code might be enacted now.

We think that the entry on the assessment book opposite the name of appellant, that he had “neglected to return statement as required by Section 3629, Political Code,” sufficient. The law says that the Assessor “must note the refusal on the assessment book,” etc. It seems to us that the entry which he made was the equivalent of that.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Oreña v. Sherman
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 26, 1882
Citation: 61 Cal. 101
Docket Number: No. 7,998
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.