Ordoyne v. Wilson

263 So. 2d 729 | La. | 1972

Lead Opinion

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted.





Dissenting Opinion

TATE, J.,

dissents. Although under our practice we do not normally review; purely factual determinations, this writ should be granted since this decision is in direct conflict with our recent decision in Williams v. Hudson East, 261 La. 959, 261 So.2d 629.

midpage