Ordoyne v. Wilson

263 So. 2d 729 | La. | 1972

Lead Opinion

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted.





Dissenting Opinion

TATE, J.,

dissents. Although under our practice we do not normally review; purely factual determinations, this writ should be granted since this decision is in direct conflict with our recent decision in Williams v. Hudson East, 261 La. 959, 261 So.2d 629.