History
  • No items yet
midpage
Oppenheim v. Mower
193 Ill. App. 48
Ill. App. Ct.
1915
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Judgments, § 84*—when amendment not allowable. The amendment of a judgment three days after its entry so as to make it run in favor of “Hugo Oppenheim and Bernard Strauss, a Co-partnership, trading as Oppenheim & Strauss” instead of being in favor of “Oppenheim & Strauss, a corporation” is not an amendment for a defect or imperfection in matter of form and is, therefore, not authorized by the Statute of Amendments and Jeofails (J. & A. H 301).

Case Details

Case Name: Oppenheim v. Mower
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Apr 13, 1915
Citation: 193 Ill. App. 48
Docket Number: Gen. No. 20,231
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.