Hon. Morley C. Townsend Hanover Town Counsel, Buffalo
This is in response to your letters wherein you write as the Town Counsel for the Town of Hanover. You state that the Hanover Sewer District was duly created in 1971 and a maximum amount to be expended for said improvement district was established. Thereafter, as a result of changes to the sewer system and inflation, the estimated total construction cost of the improvement district had risen above the approved maximum. In 1977, the increase in expenditure was approved pursuant to section
The Town Law sets forth the procedure to be followed whenever there is an increase in the amount proposed to be expended in an improvement district. Depending on whether the town proceeds under Articles 12, 12A or 12C of the Town Law, the town must comply with the provisions in sections 202-d, 209-h or 209-q (5), respectively. You state that the Town desires to proceed again under Article 12A and therefore must follow the procedure prescribed in section 209-h. We can find no authority to permit the waiver of the aforesaid provisions of the Town Law whenever a town seeks to exceed the maximum amount originally proposed to be expended in an improvement district, irrespective of the necessity to establish or complete an improvement. Therefore, it is our opinion that, if the property owners in the Hanover Sewer District refused to approve the increase in the maximum amount which may be spent for the subject improvement, the Town cannot legally make payment for the additional cost.
We would be remiss, however, if we did not comment on the potential effect of the determination made by the Chautauqua County Department of Health. The Department can take measures to enforce the county's sanitary code by seeking civil or criminal sanctions (Public Health Law, §§
