Hon. Neil D. Levin Formal Opinion Superintendent No. 96-F4 Banking Department 2 Rector Street New York, N Y 10006
Dear Superintendent Levin:
Your counsel has requested a formal opinion from this office regarding the priority of liens on reverse mortgage loans made pursuant to Banking Law §
You inquire whether the priority of reverse mortgage liens
is governed by sections
First authorized by Chapter 789 of the Laws of 1984, reverse mortgage loans were designed by the Legislature to serve as a vehicle through which homeowners who are over 60 years of age and who are "house rich, but cash poor" could borrow on the equity of their homes without having to forfeit possession or ownership. See, Bill Jacket, L 1993 Ch 613; seealso, New York State Senate Research Service, "Issues in Focus", 92-67; 1993 Summary of Legislation 5-13 to 5-18.1 As defined by section 6-h, reverse mortgages must conform to the provisions of RPL §§ 280 or 280-a, or to the requirements of the Federal Housing Administration's home equity conversion mortgage insurance demonstration program for so long as such program exists as provided for in section 1715Z-20 of Title 12 of the United States Code. See, Banking Law §
The amounts and times of the advances may vary according to the agreement between the bank and the borrower, but they are usually calculated by using standard annuity tables based upon the value of the home and the age of the homeowner at the time that the mortgage is contracted for. At the end of the loan term, the borrower is responsible for the repayment of the loan, usually from the proceeds of the sale of the house. See, Bill Jacket, L 1993 Ch 641.
In contrast to a reverse mortgage, a credit line mortgage is a mortgage or deed of trust, other than one made pursuant to a building loan contract, which states that it secures indebtedness under a note, credit agreement, or other financing agreement that reflects the fact that the parties reasonably contemplate entering into a series of advances, payments, and readvances, and that limits the aggregate amount at any time outstanding to a maximum amount specified in the mortgage or deed of trust. See, Real Property Law §
Since the inception of reverse mortgages in 1984, authorized banking institutions have been hesitant to offer reverse mortgages to people over the age of 60. As your letter of inquiry notes, one of the specific impediments was lender uncertainty as to the priority of the reverse mortgage lien, given that advances are made throughout the life of the loan. The 1993 amendments to Real Property Law §§
Chapter 613 of the Laws of 1993 added a new subsection 5 to Real Property Law §
Clearly, the legislative intent behind Real Property Law §§
Under sections 280 and 280-a, the lender obtains a priority of liens on reverse mortgage loans "irrespective of the date of any advance" and "notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of law". Therefore, any provision of law limiting or inconsistent with these provisions is inapplicable. This conclusion implements the legislative scheme and statement of legislative intent to encourage banking organizations to make reverse mortgage loans, in some cases for the life of the borrower. In that subdivision two of section 281 limits the priority of liens of credit line mortgages to loans made within twenty years of the recording of the credit line mortgage, that provision is inconsistent with the above provisions of sections 280 and 280-a and, therefore, is inapplicable to reverse mortgage loans made under those sections.
Sincerely,
DENNIS C. VACCO, Attorney General
