157 Mass. 595 | Mass. | 1893
To the Honorable the Senate and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
We received on the 22d instant your order adopted in concurrence, a copy of which is annexed, and we respectfully submit the following opinion.
First. Article XXI. and Article XXII. of the Amendments to the Constitution both provide as follows: “ In the census aforesaid, a special enumeration shall be made of the legal voters ; and in each city said enumeration shall specify the number of such legal voters aforesaid, residing in each ward of such city. The enumeration aforesaid shall determine the apportionment of representatives [or senators] for the periods between the taking of the census.” There must therefore be an enumeration of the legal voters residing in every ward of a city which is to constitute in the next apportionment the whole or a part of any representative or senatorial district. Such wards must be wards in existence on the .first day of May of the year in which the census is taken, and this is the only requirement of these Articles concerning the wards in which a census of the legal voters is to be taken. The Legislature, if it sees fit, can also provide for the enumeration of the legal voters residing in any other defined districts or parts of a city, but these Articles of the Constitution do not require this to be done.
Second. Until the new apportionment is made, the old apportionment must be followed in the election of senators and representatives. These Articles of the Constitution require the apportionment to be made by the Legislature at its first session after the return of the enumeration. In the year 1895 a census must be taken on the first day of May, which is to be returned into the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth on or before the last day of June. If there is a session of the Legislature begun and held in the year 1895, after the return of this enumeration, it is its duty to make the apportionment, and the apportionment may possibly be completed before the annual election in November of that year. If this happens, then this election must be held under the new apportionment. If there is no such session, then the Legislature at its session to be begun on the first Wednesday of January, 1896, must make the apportionment. The Legislature is to divide the Commonwealth “ into forty districts of adjacent territory,” each of which shall elect one senator; and “no town or ward of a city shall be divided therefor.” The Legislature is also to apportion to the several counties of the Commonwealth the representatives to which each county is entitled. The mayor and aldermen of the city of Boston and the county commissioners of other counties than Suffolk, unless special commissioners are elected for the purpose, “ shall, on the first Tuesday of August next after each assignment of representatives to each county, assemble at a shire town of their respective counties, and proceed ” to divide each county into representative districts of contiguous territory, “ and such districts shall be so formed that no town or ward of a city shall be divided therefor, nor shall any district be made which shall be entitled to elect more than three representatives.” A description of these districts “ shall be returned by the board to the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the county treasurer of each county, and to the clerk of every town in each district, to be filed and kept in their respective offices.”
Unless, then, the new apportionment is complete before the
Third. These Amendments to the Constitution were not passed to regulate the municipal organization of cities. The Constitution as originally framed made no provision for cities. Article IT. of the Amendments first authorized the General Court “ to erect and constitute municipal or city goverments,” etc., and “ to prescribe the manner of calling and holding public meetings of the inhabitants, in wards or otherwise, for the election of officers under the Constitution, and the manner of returning the votes given at such meetings.” When Articles XXI. and XXII. were adopted, every city charter which had been granted contained provisions for dividing the city into wards, and we believe that up to the present time all city charters which have been granted contain similar provisions, and we are not aware of any intention on the part of the Legislature to create cities without wards. These articles must be construed with reference to the facts existing at the time when they were adopted, and the provisions concerning wards must be held to apply to wards if they exist, not to require that every city should be divided into wards. The number of legal voters in a city may be such as to make it necessary that it be divided into wards in order properly to con
Walbridge A. Field.
Charles Allen.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
Marcus P. Knowlton.
James M. Morton.
John Lathrop.
James M. Barker.