Dear Mr. Gegenheimer:
Our office received your request for an opinion concerning the use of electronic seals to certify documents under your care, custody or control.
In particular, you have asked our office to address:
1. Whether you may attach, affix, seal or certify records with an electronic seal;
2. If it is permissible to certify records with an electronic seal, whether the electronic seal has the full effect of law as an impressed seal would have; and
3. Whether a state office, official or agency may decline to accept an electronic document electronically sealed and certified by you, solely because it is not on paper.
As an initial matter, your letter asks this opinion to assume that you, as Clerk of Court and ex officio Recorder of Mortgages, have security procedures in place that ensure the authenticity of your digital signature, including the time and date on which the signature is attached, and that you have included encryption measures to ensure secure access of the application.
Pursuant to La.C.C.P. art.
The rules of statutory construction instruct that the words of a law be given their generally prevailing meaning. La.C.C. art.
Also instructive is La.R.S.
Your request letter points to certain provisions of the Louisiana Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ("LUETA"), La.R.S.
As discussed in La. Atty. Gen. Op. No. 08-0340, as the Clerk of Court, you may adopt and implement a plan and execute contracts for the recordation of electronic documents affecting immovable property, following the requirements of La.C.C.P. art.
In light of the above, in the implementation of the plan described above, you, as the Clerk of Court and ex officio Recorder of conveyances, mortgages and other acts, are permitted to certify records with an electronic seal so long as it contains the form requirements set forth by law.4 The electronic seal has the full effect of law, as an impressed seal. Your last question is whether a state office, official or agency may decline to accept an electronic document electronically sealed and certified by you, solely because it is not on paper. As there is nothing prohibiting the use or invalidating the effect of an electronic seal, it follows that any state office, official or agency to which you submit the document may not decline to accept solely because it is not on paper.5
Although, as stated above, there is nothing prohibiting the use of or invalidating the effect of an electronic seal, there is also little authorizing it. The pursuit of legislation specifically authorizing such practice would ensure that uniform security measures are in place with the use of such technology, and would assure those accepting the documents of the authenticity of the certification.
We hope that this opinion has adequately addressed the legal issues you have raised. If our office can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.
With best regards,
JAMES D. "BUDDY" CALDWELL ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: __________________________ Emalie A. Boyce Assistant Attorney General
JDC: EAB
