65 Op. Att'y Gen. 288 | Wis. Att'y Gen. | 1976
ROBERT W. WING, District Attorney Pierce County
You advise that Pierce County has adopted a county-wide zoning ordinance, under sec. 59.97. Stats., which allows mobile homes to be located on one-acre tracts of land in agricultural and residential districts. Recently, however, a town in which the county zoning ordinance is effective adopted a town ordinance which purports to regulate the size and location of mobile homes and temporary dwellings within the town. This ordinance, which has been submitted for approval of the Pierce County Board of Supervisors, defines a "Free Standing Unit" as "a Mobile Home on a tract of land" and provides that "A free standing Mobile Home . . . cannot be located on any tract less than twenty (20) acres." *289
Based on the foregoing, you request my opinion on three questions concerning the relationship of town and county ordinances regulating mobile homes. Your questions are treated in the order in which you present them.
1. Is the provision of the town ordinance prohibiting mobile homes on any tract of land less than 20 acres a town zoning ordinance subject to the provisions of sec.
60.74 (7) in as much as the county has already adopted a county zoning ordinance?
The answer to this question is yes.
Towns are given specific authority to license and regulate mobile home parks under sec. 66.058, Stats., and sec. 66.058 (2) (b), Stats., provides that such power is "in addition to all other grants and shall be deemed limited only by the express language of this section." However, sec. 66.058, Stats., does not grant towns general authority to regulate the use and location of individual mobile homes outside mobile home parks, 60 OAG 131, 133 (1971), and even town ordinances clearly regulating mobile home parks may be required to comply with the procedural requirements applicable to town zoning ordinances enacted under the general town zoning authority, sec.
Towns do not have independent zoning authority under sec.
"(7) Town boards granted village powers by resolution adopted pursuant to section 60.18 (12) shall have power to adopt town zoning ordinances in the manner provided in section
61.35 notwithstanding any provision of this section or section60.75 provided, however, that in counties which have adopted a zoning ordinance under section 59.97 the exercise of the power to adopt a town zoning ordinance shall be subject to approval by a referendum vote of the electors of the town held at the time of any regular annual town meeting. Any zoning ordinance adopted by a town board and any amendment thereof under this subsection shall be subject to the approval of the county board in counties having a county zoning ordinance."
Based on the foregoing, it is apparent that the provisions of the town ordinance prohibiting mobile homes on any tract of land less than 20 acres is a zoning enactment subject to the provisions of sec.
2. Must the town first hold a referendum before submitting the ordinance to the county board for its approval?
This question cannot be answered yes or no.
In order to act under the provisions of sec.
*2913. Before the county board can approve the zoning ordinance of a township under the provisions of sec.
60.74 (7), must the county board or the zoning committee hold a public hearing prior to county board approval or disapproval?
The answer to this question is no.
A regular zoning ordinance can only be validly adopted upon compliance with applicable statutory hearing requirements. Stateex rel. Ryan v. Pietrzykowski (1969),
"As we construe sec. 59.97, Stats. 1947, it is not required that a public hearing be held in each town as a condition precedent to the town boards voting approval of a zoning ordinance, or an amendment thereto. but only that the one county-wide hearing required by sec. 59.97 (2), Stats. 1947, be held . . . ."
51 N.W.2d at p. 526 .
Section
Your inquiries and the facts you have provided deal with procedural considerations relating to the adoption of the town ordinance in question. While I have serious reservations this opinion does not consider the validity or the merits of the ordinance as an exercise of the police power. In this regard, however, I direct your attention generally to 95 A.L.R. 2d 716, *292
96 A.L.R. 2d 232 and 48 A.L.R. 3rd 1210. I do not have sufficient factual information to consider these issues but I invite your attention to them.
BCL:JCM