66 Op. Att'y Gen. 9 | Wis. Att'y Gen. | 1977
PATRICK J. LUCEY Governor
You have asked for my opinion on the constitutionality of two legislative proposals. The first would provide a state guarantee of loans to young farmers patterned after a similar Minnesota law. The second would utilize the state's bonding power to provide low interest loans to young farmers.
Each proposal, if enacted into law, would violate the Wisconsin Constitution.
Under the first proposal the state would guarantee loans made by private lenders. In the case of default, the state would be assigned the lender's security and interest in the loan in exchange for payment of the loan by the state. An appropriation would be made from the general fund to a special account in the state treasury to pay lenders for defaulted loans.
Article
State credit is not loaned unless the state becomes legally liable for debt. State ex rel. La Follette v. Reuter,
Since the first proposal results in a legally enforceable obligation for the state to pay to a lender an obligation incurred in favor of the lender by a young farmer, it violates art.
As to the second proposal, art.
BCL:APH