Dear Senator Uthlaut:
This opinion is in response to your questions asking:
HB 1069 passed by the second session of the Missouri General Assembly in 1982 amended chapter 205 RsMo by authorizing county hospital boards of trustees to elect from its members its own treasurer. Previously, the treasurer of the county court served as treasurer of the county hospital, having no vote on the board. HB 1069 becomes effective August 13, 1982.
County courts pursuant to section
205.160 have the authority to issue general obligation bonds and use the proceeds to build hospital facilities. Under the new amendment authorizing a county hospital board to elect its own treasurer, does responsibility and control over the general obligation bonds and related funds transfer to the new treasurer elected by the hospital board of trustees; or is the county treasurer required to retain responsibility and control over the funds and bonds since it is the county court which has the authority to issue the bonds? Would the answer to this question be different in the case of issuance of revenue bonds by the county court pursuant to section205.161 RSMo?
House Bill No. 1069, Second Regular Session, 81st General Assembly, effective August 13, 1982, amended Section
The amendment to Section
Section
The county courts of the several counties of this state are hereby authorized, as provided in sections
205.160 to205.340 , to establish, construct, equip, improve, extend, repair and maintain public hospitals, and may issue bonds therefor as authorized by the general law governing the incurring of indebtedness by counties.
The statutory law governing the issuance of general obligation bonds is contained in Sections
The moneys derived from the sale of such bonds shall be deposited in the county treasury, and the county clerk shall charge the treasurer therewith. And the said moneys shall be drawn from the treasury upon the order of the court for the purposes for which the bonds were issued.
Further, it seems clear that the provisions of Section
Insofar as general obligation bonds are concerned, the amendment to Section
Your second question asks whether the answer would be different in the case of revenue bonds issued by the county court pursuant to Section
Section
1. In addition to the bonds authorized by section
205.160 , the county court in any county exercising the rights conferred by sections205.160 to205.340 may issue and sell revenue bonds for the purpose of providing funds for the acquisition, construction, equipment, improvement, extension and repair, and furnishing of hospitals and related facilities, including medical office buildings to provide offices for rental to physicians or dentists on a hospital's medical staff, and the providing of sites therefor, including off-street parking space for motor vehicles. Such revenue bonds shall be payable, both as to principal and interest, solely from the net income and revenues arising from the operation of the hospital or the related facility or facilities, or of the hospital and the related facility or facilities, after providing for the costs of operation and maintenance thereof, or from other funds made available from sources other than from proceeds of taxation.2. Any bonds issued under the provisions of sections
205.161 to205.169 shall not be deemed to be an indebtedness of the state of Missouri, or of any county, or of the board of trustees of any such hospital, or of the individual members of any such board of trustees, and shall not be deemed to be an indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation upon the incurring of indebtedness. (Emphasis added.)
Under Section
CONCLUSION
It is the opinion of this office that the amendment of Section
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by my assistant, John C. Klaffenbach.
Very truly yours,
JOHN ASHCROFT Attorney General
