The Honorable John Wilson Chairman House Committee on Health and Welfare P. O. Box 2910 Austin, Texas 78769
Re: Whether the State may use non-matched funds to increase AFDC benefits when the result is more economical than total use of federally matched funds.
Dear Chairman Wilson:
You have requested our opinion regarding whether the State may, under article
Pursuant to its responsibility under article 695c, V.T.C.S., for administering programs for needy and dependent children, the Department of Public Welfare is presently accepting federal matching funds for AFDC programs under the formula specified in Title IV-V of the Social Security Act,
Under the other available matching formula, Title XIX of the Social Security Act,
Article 3, section 51-a(4) provides, in pertinent part:
The Legislature shall have authority to enact appropriate legislation which will enable the State of Texas to cooperate with the Government of the United States in providing assistance to and/or medical care on behalf of needy persons, in providing rehabilitation and any other services included in the federal laws making matching funds available to help such families and individuals attain or retain capability for independence or self-care, to accept and expend funds from the Government of the United States for such purposes in accordance with the laws of the United States as they now are or as they may hereafter be amended, and to make appropriations out of state funds for such purposes; provided that the maximum amount paid out of state funds to or on behalf of any needy person shall not exceed the amount that is matchable out of federal funds. . . .
(Emphasis added).
In our opinion, this proviso does not require that every particular State dollar expended be matched, but merely limits total State expenditures to the amount that is matchable out of federal funds. In Attorney General Opinion H-437 (1974), we indicated that the Legislature had the `authority to enact legislation authorizing a matching formula of 50% state dollars with 50% federal dollars for grants for and to needy families with dependent children.' You state that, under either the Title IV-A or the Title XIX matching formula, the State's contribution for an average monthly grant between $32.00 and $37.72 would be less than 50 percent of the total. As a result, it is our opinion that the use of either formula would not contravene the provisions of article 3, section 51-a.
Very truly yours,
John L. Hill Attorney General of Texas
Approved:
David M. Kendall First Assistant
C. Robert Heath Chairman Opinion Committee
