Mr. Terrell I. Murphy, Commissioner Texas Department of Assistive and Rehabilitative Services 4900 North Lamar Boulevard Austin, Texas 78751-2399
Re: Whether the Texas Commission for the Blind may impose costs for providing information to its licensees under the Federal Randolph-Sheppard Act, 20 United States Code section 107 (RQ-0134-GA)
Dear Commissioner Murphy:
You ask whether the Texas Commission for the Blind may impose costs for providing information to its licensees under the Federal Randolph-Sheppard Act.1
Section 107b-1 of the Act provides:
In addition to other requirements imposed in this title and in this chapter upon State licensing agencies, such agencies shall —
(1) provide to each blind licensee access to all relevant financial data, including quarterly and annual financial reports, on the operation of the State vending facility program.
Sec. 395.12 Access to program and financial information.
Each blind vendor under this part shall be provided access to all financial data of the State licensing agency relevant to the operation of the State vending facility program, including quarterly and annual financial reports, provided that such disclosure does not violate applicable Federal or State laws pertaining to the disclosure of confidential information. Insofar as practicable, such data shall be made available in braille or recorded tape. At the request of a blind vendor State licensing agency staff shall arrange a convenient time to assist in the interpretation of such financial data.
The PIA, chapter 552 of the Government Code, provides that "[a]n officer for public information of a governmental body shall promptly produce public information for inspection, duplication, or both on application by any person to the officer." Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §
Subchapter F of chapter 552 of the Government Code governs the cost provisions of the PIA. Section 552.261 declares that "[t]he charge for providing a copy of public information shall be an amount that reasonably includes all costs related to reproducing the public information, including costs of materials, labor, and overhead." Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §
In the first place, neither the Act nor the regulations promulgated thereunder imposes a charge for access to "relevant financial data." Second, the regulations recognize, to a very limited extent, the existence of state public information laws. Specifically, they make the requisite information available to blind vendors, "provided that such disclosure does not violate applicable Federal or State laws pertaining to the disclosure of confidential information."
Furthermore, unlike the PIA, the regulations require that "[i]nsofar as practicable . . . [financial] data shall be made available in braille or recorded tape." Id. More significantly, the Commission is directed, "[a]t the request of a blind vendor," to "arrange a convenient time to assist in the interpretation of such financial data." Id. By contrast, the PIA imposes no requirement on a governmental body to "interpret" information that it discloses to a requestor. Indeed, the PIA does not contemplate that a governmental body shall prepare new information in response to a request. See A T Consultants v.Sharp,
In sum, the Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder are not public disclosure laws. They require access to andinterpretation of particular financial data to a limited class of individuals. They bear little or no relation to the Texas PIA. Because neither the Act nor its regulations imposes costs for access to the information that must be disclosed to blind vendors, we decline to import the cost provisions of the PIA into the federal statute and regulations. Thus, we conclude that the Texas Commission for the Blind may not impose costs for providing information to its licensees under the Federal Randolph-Sheppard Act.
Very truly yours,
GREG ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas
BARRY McBEE First Assistant Attorney General
DON R. WILLETT Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
NANCY S. FULLER Chair, Opinion Committee
Rick Gilpin Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
