REQUESTED BY: James S. Cashin, Director Nebraska Public Employees Retirement Systems
The Nebraska State Employees Retirement Act, Neb. Rev. Stat.§§
Employee shall mean any . . . person or officer employed by the State of Nebraska whose compensation is paid out of state funds or funds controlled or administered by a state department through any of its executive or administrative officers when acting exclusively in their respective official, executive, or administrative capacities. Employees shall not include . . . (k) employees of the Coordinating Commission for Postsecondary Education who are eligible for and have elected to become members of a qualified retirement program approved by the commission which is commensurate with retirement programs at the University of Nebraska.
The language at (k) was added by LB 1068 ". . . to allow employees of the Coordinating Commission for Postsecondary Education, who are eligible for alternative retirement programs, to opt out of the State Retirement System and opt into the alternative retirement program." Introducer's Statement of Intenton LB 1068, 93rd Neb. Leg., 2nd Sess. (January 27, 1994).
Certain employees of the Coordinating Commission for Postsecondary Education (the "CCPE") are now considering whether they should elect to opt out of the State Retirement System in favor of another system available to CCPE employees. That group of employees apparently includes both vested and non-vested members of the state system.1 The potential departure from the state system by the CCPE employees has raised some controversy as to the status of the various accounts of those employees in the state system. That controversy resulted in your opinion request to us. Specifically, you have asked us:
1. If a non-vested employee elects to join another qualified plan, is their state retirement system employer account forfeited back to the State of Nebraska?
2. If the employee joins the other plan, can they take out their employee account?
3. If the employee joins the other plan and they are vested, can they take out the employer account?
We will discuss your various questions below.
At the outset, we must note that there are no Nebraska Supreme Court decisions or previous opinions from this office which shed light on the precise questions presented in your opinion request. Moreover, we have reviewed the legislative history of LB 1068 from 1994, and it offers little assistance as well. As a result, we must rely on the plain language of the statutes dealing with the retirement system.
Section
(1) Any member of the retirement system who ceases to be an employee before becoming eligible for retirement under section
84-1317 may, upon application to the board, receive:(a) If not vested, a termination benefit not to exceed the amount in his or her employee account (i) payable in a lump sum or (ii) payable in a lump sum deferred no later than the sixtieth day after the end of the year in which the member attains the age of seventy and one-half years;
(b) If vested, a termination benefit not to exceed (i) the amount in his or her employee account payable in a lump sum plus a deferred account provided by his or her employer account under which the lump-sum or first annuity payment shall be made no later than the sixtieth day after the end of the year in which the member attains the age of seventy and one-half years, (ii) the amount of the employee account payable in a lump sum plus a lump sum of the employer account deferred no later than the sixtieth day after the end of the year in which the member attains the age of seventy and one-half years, or (iii) the total amount of the employee account and the employer account payable in a lump sum deferred no later than the sixtieth day after the end of the year in which the member attains the age of seventy and one-half years; or
(c) A deferred account provided by the employee account and, if vested, the employer account under which the lump-sum or first annuity payment shall be made no later than the sixtieth day after the end of the year in which the member attains the age of seventy and one-half years.
(Emphasis added). Section
One basis for the argument that §
We do not believe that this argument is persuasive. Section titles are not part of the law and have no bearing on a statute's application. In Re Estate of Eugenia A. Peterson,
It is also asserted that §
In our view, this position once again ignores the plain language of the applicable statutes. Under the provisions of §
Finally, it is contended that there is precedent for allowing the rights of a retirement systems member to vest upon his or her election to transfer to another approved retirement plan on the basis of §
Any state employee who is a member of the State Employees Retirement System of the State of Nebraska and whose status is changed by the Legislature to that of an employee of a mental health region or an employee of a community mental health center shall, upon application to the Public Employees Retirement Board, obtain full and immediate vesting in any prior service retirement benefits and any future service retirement benefits which have accrued to the date of transfer.
However, the very existence of §
In sum, we believe that those CCPE employees who voluntarily opt out of the State Employees Retirement System in favor of another program "cease to be an employee" in the system under §
Sincerely yours,
DON STENBERG Attorney General
Dale A. Comer Assistant Attorney General
APPROVED BY:
Don Stenberg Attorney General
